A number of my articles have mentioned the unpredictable human factor in executing emergency plans and managing incidents, particularly for complex incidents. We can build great plans and have a great management system to facilitate the incident management process, but the human factor – that largely intangible level of unpredictability of human behavior – can steer even the best emergency plan astray or derail an incident management process.
An article published in the Domestic Preparedness Journal yesterday, written by Eric McNulty, reflects on this. Mr. McNulty cites several human factors which have relevance within incident management and encourages leaders to understand these factors within themselves and others to bring about more effective leadership. The introductory paragraph of his article suggests the need for integrating behavior training into ICS training to ‘improve performance and outcomes’. Given the impact of behavior factors on how we respond, this is a concept I can certainly endorse for a much-needed rewrite of the ICS curriculum.
I’ve heavily referenced Chief Cynthia Renaud’s paper, The Missing Piece of NIMS: Teaching Incident Commanders How to Function in The Edge of Chaos, in the past and continue to hold her piece relevant, especially in this discussion. Chief Renaud’s suggestions draw lines parallel to behavioral factors, which suggest to me that we certainly need to integrate leadership training into ICS training. The current ICS 200 course attempts to do so, but the content simply panders to the topic and doesn’t address it seriously enough. We need to go beyond the leadership basics and explore leadership training done around the world to see what is the most effective.
Incident management is life and death – not a pick-up game of stick ball. Let’s start taking it more seriously and prepare people better for this responsibility.
© 2016 – Timothy Riecker, CEDP
Emergency Preparedness Solutions, LLC – Your Partner in Preparedness